KuraHub

← Back to search

Alexandra Primary School

Full Primary · State

Year levels
1–8
Total roll
202
Enrolment zone
Yes
Gender
Co-Educational
Every one of the 146 schools in Otago Region with a published location. Alexandra Primary School is the marked one. Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0

Where is it, and how do I get in touch?

Address
2 Ventry Street, Alexandra
Territorial authority
Central Otago District
Phone
03-4488340
Email
admin@alexprim.school.nz
Website
http://www.alexprim.school.nz
Directions
Get directions

Other schools nearby: schools in Otago

Can my child go here?

This school has an enrolment scheme, so a place is not open to every address. How enrolment zones work

Loading zone map…

Zone boundaries shown here are approximate. Ministry of Education data warns these boundaries do not have high spatial precision and can place neighbouring addresses on different sides of a line. This is not a confirmation of enrolment eligibility — always confirm directly with the school. Zone geometry also does not reflect enrolment priority rules (siblings, special character categories, ballots) — it shows the mapped boundary only.

Check if your address is in zone →

Source: Ministry of Education, CC BY 3.0 NZ

Who goes here?

Ethnicity breakdown of the total roll, shown as context. Not ranked, and not compared against any average.

European
181
Māori
31
Pacific
6
Asian
10
MELAA
5
Other
0
International
0

Roll by year level and age

Shown as context, not ranked, not compared to any average. As at 30 June 2026, from the same annual return as the roll count above.

By year level
MāoriPacificAsianMELAAOtherEuropean/ PākehāInternational studentsTotal
Year 012021022025
Year 026000027027
Year 033032021026
Year 043122124027
Year 053100024028
Year 066100015021
Year 074000120023
Year 086101025030
Total3347621780207
By age
MāoriPacificAsianMELAAOtherEuropean/ PākehāInternational studentsTotal
Age 051021023025
Age 066000026026
Age 074022022027
Age 083132122026
Age 093100024028
Age 106100017023
Age 114000118021
Age 125101020025
Age 1310000606
Total3347621780207

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0

Student engagement

Age-standardised stand-down rate per 1,000 students — 2024

21%

Alexandra Primary School21%
Otago Region36.8%
Full Primary35.6%
State40.2%
New Zealand37.1%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female0%
Male42.8%
Māori0%
Pacific0%
Asian0%
Other0%
European/Pākehā25.5%
Total21%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison stand-down rates data (2024)

Age-standardised suspension rate per 1,000 students — 2024

0%

Alexandra Primary School0%
Otago Region4.6%
Full Primary3.9%
State4.5%
New Zealand4.1%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female0%
Male0%
Māori0%
Pacific0%
Asian0%
Other0%
European/Pākehā0%
Total0%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison suspension rates data (2024)

Age-standardised exclusion rate per 1,000 students — 2024

0%

Alexandra Primary School0%
Otago Region2%
Full Primary1.7%
State1.9%
New Zealand1.8%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female0%
Male0%
Māori0%
Pacific0%
Asian0%
Other0%
European/Pākehā0%
Total0%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison exclusion data (2024)

About the school

Equity Index (EQI)
447
Boarding
No
Language of instruction
All students taught in English/other setting
Urban / rural
Small urban area
Date opened
30 September 1864

The Equity Index is used by the Ministry to allocate equity funding. It describes the socio-economic barriers a school’s students face, not how good the school is. How the Equity Index works

What did ERO find?

The Education Review Office reviews every school and publishes what it finds in full. We quote ERO’s report here, section by section, in ERO’s own words and order, and link to it. We do not summarise a report, pick a line out of one, or turn one into a score. How ERO reviews schools

Reports ERO holds
5
Last reviewed
27 February 2025
Latest report
School Evaluation Report
Report type
Evaluation report
Board assurance
The board attested to all areas (27 February 2025)

A board assurance statement is the board’s own account of whether it took all reasonable steps to meet its legal obligations, on the date shown. It is not ERO’s finding. ERO reports separately, in the same report, on any non-compliance it identified during that process.

The board assurance report of 27 February 2025 carries no actions-for-compliance section — the section ERO uses when it names non-compliance it identified. That is what this report contains; it is not ERO saying it found none. Other reports ERO holds for this school may say something different.

The roll ERO recorded, and when

ERO writes a roll into each report it publishes: a count taken for that report, on the day shown, by the review team that was there. The Ministry of Education’s current roll for this school is 202 — the figure at the top of this page, and the one to use for how big the school is now. These are a different measurement by a different body, so they will rarely agree, and a difference between them is not a change in the school.

  1. May 2019

    224

    Counted while ERO’s review team was at the school. Education Review Office, report of 24 June 2019

This is one count taken for one report. It says what the roll was on that day, and nothing about how the roll has moved.

What ERO wrote in its latest report

This is ERO’s report of 27 February 2025 — “School Evaluation Report” — section by section, under ERO’s own headings, in ERO’s own order. Nothing is summarised, shortened or reordered.

School Evaluation Report

Tēnā koutou e mau manawa rahi ki te kaupapa e aro ake nei, ko te tamaiti te pūtake o te kaupapa. Mā wai rā e kawe, mā tātau katoa

We acknowledge the collective effort, responsibility and commitment by all to ensure that the child remains at the heart of the matter.

Context

Alexandra Primary School is a state school for learners from Years 1 to 8 in Alexandra. It places an emphasis on all learners, whānau, community and staff feeling that they belong, which is reinforced by its vision, “deep learning in a safe and diverse environment where everyone belongs”.

There are three parts to this report.

Part A: A summary of the findings from the most recent Education Review Office (ERO) published report and subsequent evaluation.

Part B: An evaluative summary of learner outcomes and school conditions to inform the school board’s future strategic direction, including education in Rumaki /bilingual settings.

Part C: The improvement actions prioritised for the school’s next evaluation cycle.

Part A: Previous Improvement Goals

Since the previous report in October 2022, ERO and the school have worked together to evaluate the impact of the development of a responsive and inclusive local curriculum, designed to ensure all learners’ achievement and progress is reflective of their individual needs, strengths and interests.

Expected Improvements and Findings

The school expected to see:

That teachers know their learners well and hold high expectations about their achievement.

Teachers respect and show understanding of each learner’s cultures, wellbeing, strengths and needs and are developing productive learning relationships to accelerate learner progress.

Teachers increasingly hold high expectations about each student’s learning potential; engagement and achievement have improved.

Teachers and leaders analyse the effectiveness of strategies to accelerate learning and use this information to inform planning.

Effective assessment for learning is embedded so that teachers notice, recognise and respond to learning needs and aspirations.

Teachers share snapshots of progress and achievement information with learners, parents and whānau that clearly identify next steps in reading, writing and mathematics.

Improved understandings about teaching practices that make the greatest impact on learner progress practices enable teachers to more systematically support learners to achieve intended learning outcomes .

Teachers’ more deliberate use of exemplars, shared learning intentions and success criteria has increased learners’ understandings about what they are learning and when they have achieved their learning goals.

Ākonga who know themselves as learners and are excited about their learning.

Teachers increasingly effective use of learner feedback is resulting in teaching and learning that is better aligned with learners’ strengths, interests and needs.

Sharing learning snapshots between learners, parents and whānau has increased learners’ understanding of their own learning strengths, progress and next steps in reading, writing and mathematics.

The greatest shift that occurred in response to the school’s actions is teachers’ increased capacity to build strong learner focused relationships is leading to better understanding for planning each learner’s next steps in learning.

Part B: Current state

The following findings are to inform the school’s future priorities for improvement.

Learner Success and Wellbeing

Outcomes for learners are increasingly equitable.

Achievement in reading and writing is improving; the large majority of learners are achieving at or above curriculum expectations, with equitable achievement for Māori learners.

The majority of learners are achieving at or above curriculum expectations in mathematics; leaders are initiating steps to improve achievement in mathematics.

Most learners identified as needing to make accelerated progress make consistent progress supported by teachers’ effective use of personalised learning strategies.

Learner attendance is approaching but not yet at the Government’s target; the large majority of learners attend regularly.

Conditions to support learner success

School leadership increasingly strengthens relational trust and collaboration to deliver improvements in learning.

Leaders successfully develop collective responsibility for teachers to use of data and inquiry to understand and respond to learners’ strengths and needs.

Leaders develop cohesive professional learning for teachers increasing their confidence and understandings about effective practice; improved learning outcomes are evident as a result of improved practice.

Leaders prioritise the development of leadership of curriculum initiatives that increase learner achievement.

Team based approaches to teaching positively impacts learners’ progress in reading, writing and mathematics.

Teachers are collectively taking steps to improve teaching, assessment practice and curriculum design to benefit student learning, progress and achievement.

Teachers use the school’s curriculum to increasingly respond to the community’s languages, cultures and identities; outcomes are improved through learners exploring this connection to the local area.

Teachers systematically compare and analyse achievement data across the school to ensure consistency of achievement judgements and inform the planning of next steps in learning.

The school is establishing effective conditions to support partnerships in learning.

The school provides an inclusive environment affirming and supporting learners with opportunities to develop their differing strengths, interests and identities as learners.

The board and school leadership have established clear strategic goals that are increasingly linked to the community’s aspirations, learners’ needs, and to enact its vision.

Part C: Where to next?

The agreed next steps for the school are to:

develop cohesive teaching and learning strategies which raise learner achievement

continue to embed assessment for learning practices

increase connections to learners’ home and community contexts to enrich the local curriculum

embed strategies to improve and sustain regular attendance.

The agreed actions for the next improvement cycle and timeframes are as follows:

Within six months

leaders provide individualised teacher professional learning to develop teaching practices that improve equitable outcomes for all learners

leaders develop a teaching, learning and assessment schedule to provide clear guidance to teaching consistency and lift expectations about all students’ learning progress and next steps

Every six months

leaders and teachers collect and review achievement information to develop an ongoing and accurate picture of each learner’s progress across the year and inform next learning steps

leaders and teachers identify and monitor learners who have not made expected levels of progress, then take steps to accelerate their achievement

leaders and teachers partner with parents, whānau and the community to continue to refine a relevant curriculum that engages learners

Annually

leaders provide evaluative reports to the board on the impact of developments on learner attendance and achievement and use findings to inform strategic and annual planning

leaders evaluate the effectiveness of community partnerships to ensure that the curriculum continues to meet all learners’ needs and increases learner engagement.

Actions taken against these next steps are expected to result in:

equitable and excellent outcomes for all learners

learners recognise their own progress and gain confidence in themselves as learners

increased connections with the community, resulting in an enhanced local curriculum that engages learners

improved and sustained levels of regular attendance.

ERO’s role will be to support the school in its evaluation for improvement cycle to improve outcomes for all learners. The next public report on ERO’s website will be a School Evaluation Report and is due within three years.

Me mahi tahi tonu tātau, kia whai oranga a tātau tamariki

Let’s continue to work together for the greater good of all children.

Sharon Kelly Acting Director of Schools

27 February 2025

About the School

The Education Counts website provides further information about the school’s student population, student engagement and student achievement. educationcounts.govt.nz/home

Read this report on ero.govt.nz →

Read the full report on ero.govt.nz →

All 5 reports ERO holds for this school

ERO reviews a school every few years — around four years between reviews is the usual cycle — so an older date here reflects where a school sits in that cycle, not how it is doing.

Source: Education Review Office, CC BY 4.0.

Roll date: 30 June 2026 (2026).