KuraHub

← Back to search

Ashburton Netherby School

Contributing · State

Year levels
1–6
Total roll
189
Enrolment zone
Yes
Gender
Co-Educational
Every one of the 293 schools in Canterbury Region with a published location. Ashburton Netherby School is the marked one. Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0

Where is it, and how do I get in touch?

Address
51 Brucefield Avenue, Netherby, Ashburton
Territorial authority
Ashburton District
Phone
03-3085799
Email
office@netherby.school.nz
Website
http://www.netherbyschool.co.nz
Directions
Get directions

Other schools nearby: schools in Canterbury

Can my child go here?

This school has an enrolment scheme, so a place is not open to every address. How enrolment zones work

Loading zone map…

Zone boundaries shown here are approximate. Ministry of Education data warns these boundaries do not have high spatial precision and can place neighbouring addresses on different sides of a line. This is not a confirmation of enrolment eligibility — always confirm directly with the school. Zone geometry also does not reflect enrolment priority rules (siblings, special character categories, ballots) — it shows the mapped boundary only.

Check if your address is in zone →

Source: Ministry of Education, CC BY 3.0 NZ

What would the day look like?

The practical things this school states on its own website — the hours, the uniform, the term dates, and how children get there. These are the school’s own words, not the Ministry’s record and not ERO’s.

Quoted from this school’s own website, as we read it on 13 August 2026. A web page carries no date of its own, so that is the day we read it — not a statement that any of this is still the case. Each line quotes the words it came from.

Uniform
  • RequiredAshburton Netherby School has a designated school uniform, which students are required to wear.
How to enrol

Check it on the school’s own website →

Who goes here?

Ethnicity breakdown of the total roll, shown as context. Not ranked, and not compared against any average.

European
75
Māori
47
Pacific
67
Asian
23
MELAA
5
Other
0
International
0

Roll by year level and age

Shown as context, not ranked, not compared to any average. As at 30 June 2026, from the same annual return as the roll count above.

By year level
MāoriPacificAsianMELAAOtherEuropean/ PākehāInternational studentsTotal
Year 0161011012023
Year 02101271014039
Year 0311941013030
Year 04494105019
Year 0551610010027
Year 06382109020
Year 0714000106
Total40681950640164
By age
MāoriPacificAsianMELAAOtherEuropean/ PākehāInternational studentsTotal
Age 0561011012023
Age 06101151014036
Age 07101141013031
Age 08584105019
Age 095153008027
Age 103721011020
Age 1116000108
Total40681950640164

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0

Student engagement

Age-standardised stand-down rate per 1,000 students — 2024

106.6%

Ashburton Netherby School106.6%
Canterbury Region38.3%
Contributing35.6%
State40.2%
New Zealand37.1%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female32.5%
Male171.6%
Māori342.4%
Pacific38%
Asian0%
Other0%
European/Pākehā0%
Total106.6%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison stand-down rates data (2024)

Age-standardised suspension rate per 1,000 students — 2024

0%

Ashburton Netherby School0%
Canterbury Region3.7%
Contributing3.5%
State4.5%
New Zealand4.1%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female0%
Male0%
Māori0%
Pacific0%
Asian0%
Other0%
European/Pākehā0%
Total0%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison suspension rates data (2024)

Age-standardised exclusion rate per 1,000 students — 2024

0%

Ashburton Netherby School0%
Canterbury Region1.7%
Contributing1.5%
State1.9%
New Zealand1.8%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female0%
Male0%
Māori0%
Pacific0%
Asian0%
Other0%
European/Pākehā0%
Total0%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison exclusion data (2024)

About the school

Equity Index (EQI)
501
Boarding
No
Language of instruction
All students taught in English/other setting
Urban / rural
Medium urban area
Date opened
6 September 1959

The Equity Index is used by the Ministry to allocate equity funding. It describes the socio-economic barriers a school’s students face, not how good the school is. How the Equity Index works

What did ERO find?

The Education Review Office reviews every school and publishes what it finds in full. We quote ERO’s report here, section by section, in ERO’s own words and order, and link to it. We do not summarise a report, pick a line out of one, or turn one into a score. How ERO reviews schools

Reports ERO holds
5
Last reviewed
2 December 2024
Latest report
School Evaluation Report
Report type
Evaluation report
Board assurance
The board attested to all areas (2 December 2024)

A board assurance statement is the board’s own account of whether it took all reasonable steps to meet its legal obligations, on the date shown. It is not ERO’s finding. ERO reports separately, in the same report, on any non-compliance it identified during that process.

The same report — the board assurance report of 2 December 2024 — also sets out actions for compliance: the non-compliance ERO identified during that process. This is that section of the report in full, in ERO’s words.

ERO and the board have identified the following areas of non-compliance during the board assurance process:

The board must ensure that names and positions of staff authorised to use physical restraint are available to the community. [Education and Training Act 2020, section 100, [Rule 6]]

The board has since addressed the areas of non-compliance identified.

Read this board assurance report on ero.govt.nz →

The roll ERO recorded, and when

ERO writes a roll into each report it publishes: a count taken for that report, on the day shown, by the review team that was there. The Ministry of Education’s current roll for this school is 189 — the figure at the top of this page, and the one to use for how big the school is now. These are a different measurement by a different body, so they will rarely agree, and a difference between them is not a change in the school.

  1. August 2017

    144

    Counted while ERO’s review team was at the school. Education Review Office, report of 27 September 2017

This is one count taken for one report. It says what the roll was on that day, and nothing about how the roll has moved.

What ERO wrote in its latest report

This is ERO’s report of 2 December 2024 — “School Evaluation Report” — section by section, under ERO’s own headings, in ERO’s own order. Nothing is summarised, shortened or reordered.

School Evaluation Report

Tēnā koutou e mau manawa rahi ki te kaupapa e aro ake nei, ko te tamaiti te pūtake o te kaupapa. Mā wai rā e kawe, mā tātau katoa.

We acknowledge the collective effort, responsibility and commitment by all to ensure that the child remains at the heart of the matter.

Context

Ashburton Netherby School is situated in Ashburton and provides education for students in Years 1 to 6. The school PRIDE values are ’perseverance, responsibility, integrity, diligence and excellence’, and these underpin the curriculum.

There are three parts to this report.

Part A: A summary of the findings from the most recent Education Review Office (ERO) report and/or subsequent evaluation.

Part B: An evaluative summary of learner success and school conditions to inform the school board’s future strategic direction, including any education in Rumaki /bilingual settings.

Part C: The improvement actions prioritised for the school’s next evaluation cycle.

Part A: Previous Improvement Goals

Since the previous ERO report in August 2022, the school and ERO have worked together to evaluate how effectively the school supports improved outcomes for learners in reading.

Expected Improvements and Findings

The school expected to see:

Increased equity between boys’ and girls’ achievement in reading and accelerated reading outcomes for students who were not achieving at an expected level.

Significant improvements in reading outcomes for learners are evident; a large majority of students now achieve at or above curriculum expectations.

Students at risk of not achieving had a range of programmes and initiatives put in place to support their learning; as a result, some students’ learning was accelerated.

Equity in outcomes between groups of students has shown significant improvement for Pacific students and Māori students, particularly for boys in reading; continuing to improve outcomes for Māori students remains a priority.

A strengthening and building of teacher capacity and capability in the science of reading.

Sustained participation in schoolwide targeted professional learning and development for teachers in the science of reading, has strengthened their collective knowledge and delivery of reading approaches.

Other Findings

The greatest shift that occurred in response to the school’s action was the introduction of a consistent approach to the teaching of reading that ensures a cohesive approach for learners as they transition through the school.

Part B: Current State

The following findings are to inform the school’s future priorities for improvement.

Learner Success and Wellbeing

Most students are engaged, make good progress and achieve well.

A large majority of students achieve at or above curriculum expectations in reading and writing, and most students achieve well in mathematics.

Increasing equity across groups of students is evident with significant improvement for Pacific students; improving outcomes for Māori students remains a priority for the school.

Students at risk of underachievement have a wide range of supports in place; effective rates of accelerated progress in reading, writing and mathematics for these learners is evident.

A small majority of students are attending school regularly; the school is not yet meeting the Ministry of Educations target for attendance in 2024.

Conditions to support learner success

C ollaborative leadership sets and actively pursues evidence-based improvement goals.

Leaders and teachers carefully monitor and track progress and achievement for those students who are at risk of not achieving, so that responsive changes are made to teaching strategies and programmes.

Leadership continually engages in professional knowledge building with teachers; this intentional approach enhances teaching and learning.

Leaders set targets and use evidence-based interventions to facilitate ongoing innovation, improvement and development of teacher capabilities for improved outcomes for learners.

Teaching is increasingly responsive to the many different needs of learners.

Teachers work collaboratively to develop and implement teaching and learning opportunities that are increasingly inclusive of students’ languages, cultures and identities.

Teachers are highly reflective and make appropriate changes to their practices based on, and targeted to, the identified needs of learners.

Teachers consistently create learning environments that foster improved learner engagement, inclusive participation and positive, mutually respectful teacher-learner relationships.

Key organisational conditions are well established and support student success.

The board is well informed by leaders about teaching and learning across curriculum areas and progress and achievement for all students; this supports effective decision making for resourcing.

Leaders and teachers undertake regular analysis of student wellbeing information to identify and plan improvement focused actions that promote student engagement and outcomes.

Leaders and teachers increasingly use internal evaluation to identify areas of strength and target ongoing improvement in teaching and learning.

The school has established community partnerships that guide the development of the school’s vision and values and informs improvement priorities; they continue to strengthen partnerships with whānau, hapū and iwi and the Pacific community.

Part C: Where to next?

The agreed next steps for the school are to:

continue to strengthen teaching practice to accelerate achievement and improve equitable outcomes for Māori students in reading, writing and mathematics

increase the range of strategies used to improve students’ regular attendance.

The agreed actions for the next improvement cycle and timeframes are as follows.

Within six months:

identify effective practice in literacy and mathematics teaching; use this to inform enhanced strategies for responding to learner needs, particularly for Māori students

consult with students and parents to understand attendance issues and develop an improvement plan

Every six months:

collate and analyse student progress and achievement data for trends and patterns, use this to inform actions towards improving outcomes and improving equity in reading, writing and mathematics, particularly for Māori students

review intentional strategies used to improve attendance, acknowledge what is working and identify where to next

Annually:

use indicators of effective practice to evaluate the impact of initiatives for continued improvements in attendance, engagement, wellbeing and achievement

report on student outcomes in reading, writing and mathematics to the board and community to inform progress towards achieving annual targets and identify strategies for where to next

report to the board on improvements in rates of regular attendance and prioritise goals accordingly.

Actions taken against these next steps are expected to result in:

sustained and improved outcomes for Māori and Pacific students

improved progress and achievement outcomes for all learners

more students attending regularly.

ERO’s role will be to support the school in its evaluation for improvement cycle to improve outcomes for all learners. The next public report on ERO’s website will be a School Evaluation Report and is due within three years.

Me mahi tahi tonu tātau, kia whai oranga a tātau tamariki Let’s continue to work together for the greater good of all children

Shelley Booysen Director of Schools

2 December 2024

About the School

The Education Counts website provides further information about the school’s student population, student engagement and student achievement. educationcounts.govt.nz/home

Read this report on ero.govt.nz →

Read the full report on ero.govt.nz →

All 5 reports ERO holds for this school

ERO reviews a school every few years — around four years between reviews is the usual cycle — so an older date here reflects where a school sits in that cycle, not how it is doing.

Source: Education Review Office, CC BY 4.0.

Roll date: 30 June 2026 (2026).